This website uses cookies to help you make the most of your visit.
By continuing to browse without changing your settings, you agree to our use of cookies.
Give me more information
x
-->

Pharmacy inspections

Inspection reports and learning from inspections

Skip to Content (Press Enter)

K Pharmacy (1039596) - Improvement action plan

Standard not met Reason Action being taken by the Pharmacy By when Notification By Pharmacy Improvements Made
1.1

Pharmacy team members do not always follow standard operating procedures (SOPs) to complete key tasks. And this adds additional risks into the pharmacy processes. The pharmacy doesn’t review its SOPs regularly as advised to ensure they are relevant and up to date.

The Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) within the pharmacy have all been reviewed since the inspection date.

Following this, each of the SOPs were read through by each member of the pharmacy team and discussed individually within a team meeting to assist in providing any further clarification to the team. Within this meeting, the significance of SOPs and the importance of adhering to these procedures in maintaining safe and effective working practices was also emphasised to ensure their immediate and long-lasting implementation within the pharmacy.

Each team member was required to document their name and signature after reading each SOP to maintain a comprehensive audit trail. In addition to this, the location of the SOPs was clearly shown to all team members thus, allowing for easier access within the future.

20/12/2019 17/12/2019
1.2

The pharmacy team members don’t make any records following dispensing incidents. And, they don't make any changes to the way they work. The pharmacy team members do not record, discuss or analyse all near miss errors that happen. They do not always make changes to help prevent mistakes happening again. So, they may miss opportunities to learn and make their services safer.

Following the inspection, an immediate team meeting was held to determine the reasoning of why a comprehensive record of errors was not being maintained prior to the inspection date.

After determining these contributory factors, a full explanation surrounding the importance of near miss error documentation was provided to the entire pharmacy team and a new SOP guiding the reporting, documentation and evaluation of near miss errors was introduced.
Following this, all team members had agreed that a change in error documentation, reporting and evaluation was vital in preventing recurrent errors within the pharmacy’s working and have modified their working practices to record all near miss errors that have occurred since the inspection date.

As part of the reviewed pharmacy practice, all near miss errors that occur within our pharmacy are communicated to the entire pharmacy team immediately after initial recognition. Alongside this, the near miss errors of each month are pre-evaluated and discussed in greater detail within monthly meetings to ensure any future error reduction action encompasses the views and opinions of all pharmacy team members thus, increasing the likelihood of its long-lasting implementation.

After this discussion, each of the near miss error recording sheets are stored within the appropriate folder within the dispensary for future reference.

20/12/2019 17/12/2019
1.4

The pharmacy does not adequately respond to feedback received at previous inspections. And the required standards are not maintained.

The areas for improvement indicated within the last inspection report were resolved at the time of the previous review. However, it has become clear that though the required improvements had been initially achieved, they were not appropriately maintained in the long-term practice of the pharmacy.

Through acknowledging this, a series of new practices have been introduced within the pharmacy to ensure all implemented steps remain at the expected standard for the long-term post-inspection. These actions include: the introduction of regular monthly reviews of near miss errors within practice and their integration within protected periods of the pre-scheduled monthly team meetings within a pharmacy. In addition to this, all team members have been instructed to ensure that all near miss errors are recorded within the near miss error record sheets by all individuals. All team members have been provided additional training of how to document near miss errors and provided further guidance through the provision of a newly produced Standard operating procedure to guide this action.

Since the inspection, we have reviewed the procedure regarding the reporting, discussion and action upon internal feedback. Following this, the team meetings that were initially scheduled to occur monthly have been increased in their frequency to occur on a fortnightly basis. In the interests of developing a more structured approach in reporting concerns, a separate template has also been produced to allow all members of the pharmacy team to document any proactive or reactive feedback they feel would enhance the care we provide as well as, any suggested solutions to the issues raised. Each of the concerns documented would be discussed within the next team meeting alongside any other issues that are verbally expressed by the pharmacy team. By doing so, this would establish a more effective process in resolving these issues through accommodating the perspectives of all team members therefore, securing its long-lasting implementation.

In the instance where a concern only requires further clarification, a selection of brief guidance will be verbally communicated to the entire pharmacy team upon recognition of the issue. Irrespective of the nature of the concern, all issues raised will be appropriately documented and stored to maintain a clear auditable process for the actions taken and the situations resolved.

20/12/2019 17/12/2019
1.6

Some pharmacy records required by law and to assure the safety of services are incomplete and inaccurate. This includes register entries and fridge temperature records.

Since the inspection, the errors recognised within private prescription record have all been corrected and issues regarding the controlled drug registers have also all been rectified.

As part of the review of our pharmacy processes, all controlled drug register entries will now be made at the time of providing the medication to either the patient or upon receiving confirmation from our delivery driver that a successful delivery has been made. In the rare instance where this is not possible, the record will be made later within the same day to ensure a contemporaneous audit is maintained.

As mentioned previously, the details encompassed within each entry of the private prescription record have been reviewed to include: three different dates: the date on the private prescription, the date the prescription has been dispensed and the date the patient has collected the item/s on the private prescription. The significance of this information being recorded at the point of dispensing has been communicated to the entire pharmacy team in conjunction to this, all private prescription records retrospective to the inspection date have also been corrected.

A two-step approach has been adopted within the pharmacy to prevent the unintentional provision of expired medication to patients. Firstly, a designated booklet has be created to detail specific medicines nearing their expiry date (Within 1 month of expiry). Through documenting this, it will support a more efficient method in monitoring which medications requiring disposal at a nearing date.

In addition to this, a separate shelf within the dispensary has been allocated to only store those medications within 1 month of their expiry date. Through implementing this new practice, it is hoped that it would assist in further reducing the risk of the sale/dispensing of unsuitable, expired medication to patients.

Prior to the inspection date, a designated folder had been allocated to archive documentation surrounding the previous public health campaigns undertaken within the pharmacy. However, it was clear that not all staff members were clear of the area in which it was stored. To rectify this, all members of the pharmacy team have been re-informed of the material kept within this folder, its location within the pharmacy and the need for its continued maintenance within the future.

Since the inspection date, the fridge temperature monitoring document has been reviewed and a twice daily pre-scheduled assessment of the fridge temperature has been introduced within the pharmacy to ensure the required temperature is maintained. These newly introduced steps will occur in conjunction with the monitoring performed by the automated electronic thermometer already installed within the pharmacy.

This electronic thermometer would allow for a monthly report of 24-hour temperature recordings would be automatically upload and stored online. Following each month, a monthly report/ chart will be printed, checked and filed away in the designated folder. During the charging process of the electronic monitor a separate document has been created to ensure continuous monitoring of fridge temperatures.

06/12/2019 17/12/2019
2.4

The pharmacy team's dynamic is sometimes dysfunctional. The pharmacy team members are sometimes deployed in ways that do not efficiently use the skills of the whole team. And they do not complete key tasks which may affect the quality of the services people receive.

As mentioned previously, each of the team members have been provided a guidance resource to assist in increasing the clarity of their specific work roles within the pharmacy. Also, the SOP’s within the pharmacy have been reviewed and discussed with the pharmacy team.

A daily and monthly checklist has also been created and communicated to the pharmacy team to ensure that essential tasks have been completed at the correct time.

Following a discussion with the pharmacist, a number of actions that were previously her responsibility have been delegated to other competent staff members, in order to reduce her workload. This action was discussed and agreed with the rest of the pharmacy team prior to its implementation. In conjunction, I will now ensure that I review the performance of each team member on a weekly basis to ensure the quality of the services provided and the records produced is not detrimentally affected.

As part of my role as the superintendent pharmacist, I aim to support all members of the pharmacy team in delivering exceptional patient care at a standard expected by the General Pharmaceutical Council. Since the inspection, I have adapted my own working practices to enhance degree of the support that I provide to the pharmacist through mentoring her actions and directly encouraging the expansion of her skillset in securing the safe and effective workings of the pharmacy. In addition to this, I have now scheduled weekly meetings with the pharmacist to provide her an opportunity to discuss and co-operatively resolve any issues that she has encountered within pharmacy workings. The discussion within these meetings will now also been recorded on new template documents for future reference.

20/12/2019 17/12/2019
2.1

The pharmacy usually has enough staff with the right qualifications for the services it provides. But, sometimes the team does not have the necessary skills to effectively fulfil their roles. This means the pharmacist and team members are under pressure to complete all tasks in a timely manner. And there is a lack of planning to make sure tasks are complete when the nominated team member is not working.

A new, innovative procedure has been implemented to assist in supporting and guiding all members of the pharmacy team in, documenting and reflecting upon each of the qualifications gained as part of their employment. This has been further supported by the production of a tailored template document that would require each staff member to document a summary of their learning, the skills they believed to have gained from their qualification and methods in which they hope to integrate these into their normal working practice. Both of these new processes have been communicated as a mandatory requirement for all future qualifications completed by any member of the pharmacy team.

Further to this, all staff members will now also be required to attend a pre-scheduled meeting with the superintendent pharmacist/responsible pharmacist to review their progress following the completion of a qualification (This will be documented and archived using a meeting record document). This will provide an opportunity for each team member to discuss their learning experience and work with the superintendent pharmacist/responsible pharmacist to reflect upon their learning thus, supporting more long-lasting implementation.

With the interests of providing a greater degree of clarity relating the job roles, a collection of checklist documents listing the delegated tasks have been produced on a individualistic basis, and agreed with each team member. It is hoped that this additional resource would assist in improving the efficiency of pharmacy working as well as, optimising the unique skillset of each team member.

In the event of team member being absent, an enhanced planning system has been initiated within the pharmacy to assist in role delegation. This would involve the clear delegation of job roles to other members of the pharmacy team and the documentation of this onto a pre-made template. With this additional process, it is hoped the disruption associated with the absence of team member upon the workflow of a pharmacy is minimised.

20/12/2019 17/12/2019